This lawsuit became one of the most famous in the US history because after the court’s awarded Stella Liebeck $2.9 million, after she was severely burned by the coffee she brought from McDonald, there were debates over tort reform in the US. Liebeck became one of the urban legends of tort law after she was awarded US$2.9 million for burns she received from a spilt McDonald’s coffee over 20 years ago. She sued McDonald’s and was awarded $2.9 million, sparking a huge debate about America’s frivolous litigation trend and the urgent need for tort reform. When this case was made public, the entire nation almost instantly turned against the elderly lady and her … Here's what did happen: In February of 1992, Stella Liebeck, a 79 year old woman from Albuquerque, New Mexico sued McDonald’s Corporation for suffering third-degree burns from their … Liebeck pursued the case in court, and not to gouge the fast-food giant for cash, but to make a difference. Unit 8 Discussion Topic: McDonald’s Coffee Case Debate. An alleged drunk driver careened down the street, lost control of his car, and crashed into a phone booth. The name of the documentary comes from the infamous and widely misunderstood “McDonald's Coffee Case,” which most people believe involved a greedy coffee drinker who spilled hot coffee on herself and won millions of dollars for essentially no reason. At the center of the debate is our country’s tort system. This case came into news because of $2.7 million compensation was granted to the plaintiff. The poster-child of tort reformers is the famed “McDonald’s Coffee Case” - the case where a woman obtained a multimillion-dollar jury verdict for spilling hot coffee on herself. The case became national news when Liebeck was awarded a "$2.9 million settlement." McDonald’s and Pearson v. Custom Cleaners. Regardless, this case still impacts the debate about reform of our civil justice system (i.e., tort reform). The misconception is Stella Liebach was an elderly woman who spilled hot coffee on herself while driving. Liebeck vs. McDonalds As a very controversial tort case, Liebeck vs. McDonalds was a closely followed by the news and legal community. In 1992, Stella Liebeck spilled scalding McDonald's coffee in her lap and later sued the company, attracting a flood of negative attention. Words: 3185 - … . The Liebeck case sparked a debate all across the country regarding frivolous lawsuits and excessive jury awards. The “Hot Coffee” case occurred at the perfect time for tort-reform supporters and corporate lobbyists, who were pushing federal legislation to limit consumers’ access to courts in cases of personal injury or other harm. That lawsuit brought change though - albeit not to United Airlines. She suffered third-degree burns from the coffee and eventually sued McDonald's. Over the last decade or so, many states have enacted “tort reform” laws in response to concerns that frivolous lawsuits were out of control and hindering economic growth. The McDonald’s hot coffee case was actively lauded by tort “reformers” as an example of all that was wrong with the American civil justice system. In 1992, Stella Liebeck, 72, and her grandson went through a McDonald’s drive thru in Albuquerque, New Mexico and ordered a coffee. McDonald's Coffee and the Tort Reform Case I was just having a discussion with a conservative contact about if and why the American Middle Class is eroding. Case Law Analysis: Tort Law 2 In 1992, the case Liebeck v. McDonald’s became a pivotal point in Tort Law, and lead to a rise in “frivolous lawsuits” across the country. My acquaintance fell back on the argument of "Tort Reform". These students should clearly indicate their position on the … Hot Coffee discusses several cases and relates each to tort reform in the United States: Liebeck v. McDonald's Rests., No. She sued McDonalds for damages and the media played it out to be one big joke. The documentary drama, Hot Coffee, covers the highly misunderstood product liability case against McDonald's, as well as several other noteworthy cases demonstrating how Americans' access to the civil justice system has changed over recent years. CV-93-02419, 1995 WL 360309 (N.M. 2d Jud. It became a huge spectacle and the … One of the most recognizable cases involving Tort Reform is the McDonalds Hot Coffee case. Most people think that a careless woman spilled some hot coffee on herself while driving, received minor burns, and then filed a lawsuit. Aug. 18, 1994) (judgment awarding Liebeck $2.86 million in "hot coffee" case), vacated, 1994 WL 16777704 (Nov. 28, 1994): how tort cases are publicized to instigate tort reform. Proponents love to cite the most well-known supposed "frivolous lawsuit" is the story of Stella Liebeck - the woman who was burned by hot coffee from McDonalds. A few weeks ago, I was preparing jury voir dire questions for a short trial. McDonald’s, which is better known as the “hot coffee lawsuit” and this case has been discussed in Exhibit I in the movie. Many saw this as a signal that tort reform was in dire need. A Scalding Takedown on Tort Reform – How Stella Liebeck’s case against McDonald’s sparked a litigation revolution. The McDonalds coffee cup case was no runaway verdict but, somehow, it was turned by the media into the poster child for greedy plaintiffs who refuse to take personal responsibility and frivolous litigation. McDonald’s, also known as the McDonald’s Coffee Case, is a 1994 product liability lawsuit. Posted on 09-29-2014 by Doug Esten Tags: litigation, Trending News & Topics, trending news. Business Law Case Study 4/16/10 Liebeck V McDonald’s Corporation The case of Liebeck V McDonald’s Corporation also known as “The McDonald’s coffee case” is a well known court case which caused a lot of controversy. -Stella Liebeck made national headlines in 1992 when she sued McDonald's after spilling a scalding cup of hot coffee on her lap. NO VIOLATION: Students whose last names begin with the letters A through K will argue that McDonald’s did not violate its obligation of care to the consumer by serving coffee at 185 degrees, and tort reform is necessary to prevent these types of civil judgments. Thus, they found that the coffee was defectively manufactured. THE MCDONALD'S COFFEE SPILL CASE. McDonalds coffee case and the hot coffee lawsuit, was a 1994 product liability lawsuit that became a flashpoint in the debate in the United States over tort reform. Most people wondered how someone could be awarded so much money for spilling coffee on herself. You may be familiar with — and even outraged by — the famous lawsuit against McDonald’s by Stella Liebeck who was burned by hot coffee.